After a diagnosis of cancer there are generally
two paths open to people. They can undergo an orthodox medical
treatment program for the cancer or they can look at alternative
treatments for cancer. A third option involves doing nothing and hoping
things sort themselves out. So which is best?
Unfortunately it is practically impossible to say because there is no
absolute research into this. The reason that there is no research is
because medical professionals are not allowed to prescribe alternative
treatments. The result is that in almost all cases a patient who is
diagnosed with cancer undergoes an orthodox treatment program including
chemotherapy, surgery and radiation. Very few choose to either do
nothing or to pursue alternative treatment options.
The reasons that people tend to go the orthodox medical route are
varied and complex, but if we want to simplify things as much as
possible they boil down to this: Chemotherapy and Orthodox medication
are the treatment of choice of those seen as 'experts' on cancer, the
doctors, and it is doctors who will usually diagnose cancer. In other
words, the choice is a bogus one and a combination of chemotherapy,
surgery and radiation are usually presented as the only options there
are.
But suppose you were to be told that there is an alternative to this
trio of invasive medication. Suppose it had no side effects. Suppose it
not only helped your cancer but also greatly improved your general
health overall and suppose it wasn't going to cost you over quarter of
a million dollars(The US department of commerce reported that a cancer
patients treatment will cost over $375,000).
The alternative does actually exist, and it remarkably simple. Where
chemotherapy destroys the immune system, alternative treatment enhances
it. Where radiation kills cells indiscriminately alternative medication
only targets cancerous cells. Where surgery can often aid in the spread
of cancer alternative therapy helps your body to use it's naturally
defenses to suppress that spread. The 'cure' is nothing new, it is
merely hidden from the public as a viable option, or ridiculed as
'quakery'. Perhaps most surprising of all is that it has been supported
by some very reputable names who have put their reputation and careers
on the line to get word of it to the public, and without fail that is
exactly what they have lost.
When a doctor makes a diagnosis of cancer he will also usually include
a prescribed course of action. This usually consists of 3 parts. First
they will attempt a surgical removal of the cancer tumor, secondly
chemotherapy and radiation will be used to kill the cancer cells.
Alternative medicine will usually start with building up the immune
system and cleansing the body of toxins. Which is better?
The statistics take a little wading through, but it has been suggested
that around 45% of people will achieve a 5-year cure from cancer by
following orthodox treatment methods. This is a misleading statistic -
it is a 5 year cure not a total cure. Alternative medicine tends not to
measure 5 year cures but rather total cure rate. Orthodox medicine does
not release total cure rates though it has been suggested that their
cure rate is around 3%. Of those who attempt orthodox treatment and,
when told there is nothing more orthodox medicine can do for them ( or
that they can afford to pay for) attempt alternative medication the
total cure rate could be as high as 50%. Of those who seek alternative
treatment instead of any orthodox treatment the likely total cure rate
is close to 90%.
So if we have a 90% cure rate from alternative medicine and a 3% cure
rate from orthodox medicine, why does the alternative approach not
become the standard one. The answer is a little cloudy and is based on
those numbers being very hard to prove. Orthodox medicine does not
compare itself with alternative medicine and so the only official
numbers we see are the increase in effectiveness of their own
treatments. So to help you with your decision let's examine what danger
cancer presents and how it is dealt with.
The first thing that is probably not explained to you is that a cancer
tumor usually is not fatal. A cancer can be benign or malignant, and
only if it is malignant does it pose a serious threat(note that a
benign tumor that places pressure on a major organ or blocks an artery
is dangerous by itself - but not because of the cancer). Thus it is not
the cancer that is dangerous to our health, but the spread of the
cancer.
Alternative medication looks at the cause of this cancerous growth
which is usually the combination of a weakened immunity system and a
carcinogen. The alternative therapy will then seek to address this
problem and destroy the atmosphere which leads to the cancer. The
increased immune system, combined with fresh delivery of oxygen
prevents the cancer from spreading and eventually starves it to death.
The beauty is that this process targets only foreign cells, killing off
the cancer but not harming (and usually benefiting) the healthy cells.
Orthodox medicine treats the tumor very differently. The tumor is very
much the focal point of attack. It is treated as the problem when in
fact it is merely a symptom of the problem. Often surgery is the first
method of dealing with this problem and while this can remove the tumor
it can also release cancer cells into the bloodstream. Remember that it
is the spread of cancer that can be fatal, not the cancer itself.
Surgery may very well contribute to that spread.
Secondly radiation treats cancer by killing off the cancer cells, but
it does so indiscriminately and kills many healthy cells at the same
time. Chemotherapy drugs also seek to reduce the size of the tumor and
break down the cancer cells, but in doing so they can damage healthy
cells and decimate the immune system. Chemotherapy drugs must be
administered gradually. The reason for this is that is given all at
once they would destroy too many healthy cells and probably kill the
patient. The body must be given time to recover between chemotherapy
sessions. For some reason it is assumed the cancer will not also
recover in that time, when it will most likely spread as a result of
damaged adjoining cells and a crippled immunity system.
The biggest frustration for the advancement of alternative cancer
treatments is not providing evidence that alternative treatments work,
but getting that proof recognized. Registered doctors are not permitted
to practice alternative treatment if they wish to remain a member of
the AMA, and experiments outside the AMA are usually rubbished as not
being performed by real medical professionals. In 1976 when a 'real
medical professional', two time Nobel prize winner Linus Pauling, took
his experiments outside the country he was able to show in his Scottish
study that a cancer patients life expectancy could be extended by 600%
by merely administering 10 grams of vitamin C intravenously. Vitamin C
is well know for it's ability to build up the human immune system.
30 years ago this research by a Nobel Prize winner proved that natural
treatment can greatly improve the life expectancy of a cancer sufferer.
Natural treatment advocates have been able to refine that research to
provide even more efficient vitamin C treatments, but mainstream
medicine has not even replicated the study.
While the evidence is blurred, lied about, hidden and in same cases
destroyed, it seems clear that there is plenty of merit in pursuing
further investigation of alternative cancer therapies. There is at
enough examples of successful treatment using alternative medicines
that it cannot simply be dismissed out of hand as 'quackery' as has
been the official line. There are plenty of examples of medical
practitioners who have set out to prove alternative natural treatments
wrong and have subsequently changed their opinion to support it.
Alternative therapy is at least an adequate alternative for orthodox
medicine and most likely a very suitable replacement.
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/
medicine-articles/alternative-cancer-treatments-and-how-they-
increase-your-chance-of-survival-513192.html About the Author
Mark Branyon collaborates with international experts in continually
improving existing protocols. Their treatment strategy incorporates the
best modalities of both worlds mainstream and alternative according to
individual needs.
http://www.newhopemedicalcenter.com |